5044 results:
Summary: The bill outlines regulations for public access to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) records, detailing procedures for requests, exemptions, and the definitions of review and search times.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Jan. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text provides details about the availability and exemption of agency records, primarily focusing on processes like search and review time for Freedom of Information Act requests. There is no substantial mention of AI-related concepts; however, the term 'automated' is used in the context of information systems. This indicates a minor relation to automated processes but does not specifically connect to any of the AI categories. Therefore, the relevance is judged low across all categories.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text does not address AI within any specific sector. It focuses on record availability related to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and FOIA requests, which does not correlate with the essential functions of the sectors provided. Consequently, the relevance to each sector is very low.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill outlines procedures for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to collect debts, including salary offsets, reporting to credit bureaus, and using private collection agencies, while allowing payment in installments and waiving certain charges.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Jan. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The provided text primarily details procedures for managing debts within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), focusing on wage garnishment, reporting debts, and collection practices. It does not specifically address issues related to AI. Terms such as 'automated databases' appear but are not explicitly AI-related, nor do they engage with the broader implications of AI on society, data governance, system integrity, or robustness. As a result, none of the categories are relevant to the text, as it lacks any substantial discussion on AI-related issues or the impacts of AI.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text does not address topics pertinent to the specified sectors. Although it pertains to the management of debts within a federal agency, it does not mention the use or implications of AI in political activities, government operations, healthcare, employment, or other specified sectors. Therefore, there is no association with the sectors listed.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill reviews the USDA's implementation of agricultural research programs established under Title VII of the 2018 Farm Bill, assessing their efficacy and future opportunities for enhancing U.S. agricultural productivity.
Collection: Congressional Hearings
Status date: March 23, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: House of Representatives
The text primarily discusses the implementation of research programs by USDA with a focus on agricultural productivity and investment in research. There are no specific references to AI, machine learning, algorithms, or related technologies that would directly relate to any of the defined categories. Therefore, it is assessed as not applicable to the categories concerning social impact, data governance, system integrity, or robustness, as these would require explicit mention of AI-related issues in the context of societal effects, data management, system transparency, or performance metrics.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text discusses agricultural research within the context of legislation, specifically highlighting USDA's programs and issues affecting agricultural productivity. It does not mention AI applications in politics, public services, healthcare, or business practices. Therefore, it cannot be categorized into any of the specified sectors, as there’s no discussion of AI’s role in these areas within the text.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (6) machine learning (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill clarifies the geographic location criteria for national banks conducting electronic activities, establishes assessment fees, and outlines distinctions for products offered by banks and affiliates. It aims to modernize banking regulations in response to digital banking practices.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Jan. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text primarily discusses the regulations related to national banks conducting electronic activities, focusing on their location, operations, and financial assessments. While there are references to software and electronic processes, there is a lack of explicit discussion regarding the social impact of AI, data governance specific to AI, system integrity of AI systems, or robustness of AI technology. The terms closely associated with AI are not present, thus the relevance is minimal.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text deals mainly with the operational aspects and regulatory framework for national banks, especially concerning electronic activities. Although there are mentions of technology and software, it does not specifically address the use or regulation of AI within any of the defined sectors. Terms directly related to AI applications in political processes, government services, legal systems, healthcare, businesses, academia, international agreements, NGOs, or emerging sectors are absent.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill aims to explore and promote the use of advanced technologies, including AI and biometrics, to enhance national security and border protection efforts in the U.S.
Collection: Congressional Hearings
Status date: June 22, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: House of Representatives
Societal Impact
Data Governance
System Integrity
Data Robustness (see reasoning)
The text discusses the integration of AI into various security technologies, specifically in the context of border control and enforcement. There is a strong emphasis on how AI can enhance operational capabilities, identity verification, and security measures. The mention of AI's potential to revolutionize fields like security operations correlates directly with the Social Impact category, as it addresses implications for personnel and effectiveness in safeguarding society. Data governance is also relevant due to the importance of accurate data collection and management, which is essential for the AI applications described. System integrity is applicable given the focus on secure and faltering implementation of these technologies. Robustness is less emphasized, as the text focuses more on current applications rather than on performance benchmarking or compliance mechanisms for AI. Overall, the text strongly aligns with societal applications and implications of AI, particularly those concerning safety and operational integrity.
Sector:
Government Agencies and Public Services
Hybrid, Emerging, and Unclassified (see reasoning)
The text primarily pertains to the Government Agencies and Public Services sector, discussing the implementation of AI and cutting-edge technologies within federal law enforcement and Border Patrol operations. It does not explicitly address policies in sectors like Healthcare or Private Enterprises, nor does it delve into politics directly as it is largely focused on law enforcement practices. However, there are mentions of potential impacts on both public safety and the functioning of governmental operations, which suggests relevance primarily to government services and public security. Thus, while a greater focus on political implications related to AI could merit a higher score in that sector, the text primarily emphasizes government operational contexts of AI use.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (4) machine learning (2) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill outlines Senate business, emphasizing the importance of artificial intelligence by scheduling three Senators-only briefings to educate members on its implications and advancements, while also addressing executive and judicial nominations.
Collection: Congressional Record
Status date: June 12, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Congress
Societal Impact
Data Robustness (see reasoning)
The text discusses multiple aspects of artificial intelligence (AI), including the upcoming Senate briefings on the state of AI and its implications for national security, job creation, and civil liberties. It emphasizes the importance of understanding AI as it pertains to the future of the nation and the potential risks involved, indicating a social dimension. However, there are limited mentions of data collection or governance and system integrity, as the focus leans more toward understanding and discussing implications rather than establishing rules or frameworks. As such, the relevance to the categories varies significantly, with social impact being most significant and the others being less so.
Sector:
Politics and Elections
Private Enterprises, Labor, and Employment
Academic and Research Institutions (see reasoning)
The text primarily addresses the ongoing discussions within the Senate regarding artificial intelligence and its implications in various sectors such as national security and job creation. It supports legislation discussions tied to AI's societal impacts but does not distinctly focus on specific applications of AI in any of the predefined sectors such as healthcare or education. The emphasis is on general awareness and implications rather than distinct regulations or frameworks for specific sectors.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill examines the inadequate implementation of the No Surprises Act, which aimed to protect patients from unexpected medical bills, revealing issues that have led to reduced access to care and provider shortages.
Collection: Congressional Hearings
Status date: Sept. 19, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: House of Representatives
The text primarily discusses the implementation challenges and repercussions of the No Surprises Act on healthcare delivery. There is no mention of AI technologies or applications such as machine learning, algorithms, neural networks, or automated decision-making processes. Therefore, none of the categories directly pertain to AI-related portions of the text. Thus, all categories score very low regarding relevance.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text predominantly revolves around healthcare policy, specifically the implications of surprise medical billing regulations and their impacts on patient care and provider practices. However, there is no mention of AI applications, interventions, or regulatory measures tailored to AI's role within the healthcare sector. Hence, each sector is deemed not relevant, scoring the minimum on the relevance scale.
Keywords (occurrence): algorithm (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill mandates additional disclosure requirements for financial institutions regarding overdraft services, including fees and account terms, to enhance transparency and protect consumers from unexpected charges.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Jan. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The provided text primarily deals with consumer financial protection regulations concerning overdraft services, including disclosures required for accounts, fees, and advertising. There is no mention of AI, machine learning, or any related technologies. Therefore, the relevance of the Social Impact, Data Governance, System Integrity, and Robustness categories to this text is minimal. The focus is strictly on financial disclosures and procedural regulations rather than any impact or regulation involving AI technologies.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text pertains to the banking and financial sector, specifically focusing on overdraft regulations and consumer protection. However, there is no mention of applications or implications relevant to the specified sectors such as politics, healthcare, or government services in relation to AI. Thus, the relevance across all nine sectors remains low as the text does not involve AI or its applications. Rather, it focuses on compliance with federal regulations in consumer banking.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill addresses the challenges and risks of implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare. It advocates for regulatory measures to prioritize patient safety, equity, and transparency in AI use, aiming to prevent potential harm and discrimination.
Collection: Congressional Hearings
Status date: Nov. 8, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Senate
Societal Impact
Data Governance
System Integrity
Data Robustness (see reasoning)
The text discusses multiple aspects of AI in healthcare, including the regulatory challenges posed by AI algorithms in patient care and how automated decision-making can lead to negative outcomes, such as misdiagnoses and denial of insurance coverage based on algorithmic predictions. This raises significant concerns about social impact due to potential discrimination and harm to individuals, thus linking the text heavily to the Social Impact category. Data Governance is also relevant, as it encompasses the ethical collection and management of healthcare data, particularly how AI systems may misuse sensitive patient information. System Integrity is relevant as the text discusses the need for oversight to ensure AI algorithms operate safely and effectively within health care. Robustness is applicable as it relates to developing benchmarks and standards for AI, especially in assuring AI systems perform reliably and equitably in health settings. Overall, the text primarily focuses on the implications of AI deployment in healthcare, indicating a broad relevance to all categories.
Sector:
Healthcare
Private Enterprises, Labor, and Employment
Nonprofits and NGOs (see reasoning)
The text squarely addresses AI's role in the healthcare sector, discussing its potential benefits and risks extensively. Specific examples highlight how AI tools can impact patient care and administrative processes within healthcare systems. Issues such as algorithmic decision-making in insurance claims and medical treatment decisions point directly to the use of AI in this specific sector, ensuring strong relevance. There is no direct mention of political implications, judicial applications, research contexts, or nonprofit/NGO matters, making the healthcare sector the primary focus.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (69) machine learning (9) automated (15) chatbot (2) algorithm (44) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill establishes operational standards for retail forex counterparties to ensure fair trading practices, internal controls, and transparency in customer transactions and account management.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: April 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text primarily focuses on the standards and regulations related to retail foreign exchange trading and operations. There is no specific mention of Artificial Intelligence (AI), algorithms, or any algorithmic processes that would suggest direct relevance to the categories defined. While the legislation might imply the use of algorithms in trading practices, it does not explicitly discuss their impact on society, data governance, system integrity, or robustness in terms of AI capabilities. Therefore, it does not fall strongly into any of the provided categories.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text does not reference AI in relation to any sectors like Politics and Elections or Healthcare. It deals strictly with trading standards in the foreign exchange market without touching on the use of AI technologies or policies that regulate AI within these specific sectors. The absence of AI-related language or applications linking to these sectors means they do not receive relevant scores.
Keywords (occurrence): algorithm (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill establishes guidelines for state agencies on managing and reconciling transactions within the EBT system for authorized retailer participation in the SNAP program, ensuring compliance and accountability.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Jan. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text mainly discusses procedures related to the EBT (Electronic Benefit Transfer) system, focusing on reconciliation, reporting, and record retention for the issuance of benefits. Although it outlines processes that could involve algorithmic decision-making in the sense that it needs systematic and automated handling of data, it does not explicitly mention or focus on AI technologies. Nonetheless, aspects of monitoring and managing retailer systems could hint at algorithmic methods but lack sufficient direct references to solidify relevance under 'Social Impact,' 'Data Governance,' 'System Integrity,' or 'Robustness.' Therefore, all categories are scored 1 (Not relevant).
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text primarily relates to the management of SNAP benefits through the EBT system and does not address the implications, applications, or regulations of AI in any context. There is no mention of how AI interacts with politics, public services, the judicial system, healthcare, or any other sectors described. As such, all sectors are scored 1 (Not relevant).
Keywords (occurrence): automated (2) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill outlines responsibilities for federal agencies in collecting information, emphasizing the need for effective management, transparency, and public consultation to minimize the burden on respondents.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Jan. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
Data Governance (see reasoning)
The text primarily deals with the responsibilities and processes associated with the collection of information by government agencies, detailing how agencies must manage and review their data collection processes. There are mentions of utilizing automated and technological collection techniques, which could relate to AI systems. However, the focus is more on compliance and procedural aspects rather than on defining standards or impacts directly related to AI, bias, transparency, or robustness of AI systems. Therefore, while AI is touched upon with respect to technology in data collection, it is not a dominant theme in the text.
Sector:
Government Agencies and Public Services (see reasoning)
The text is relevant to Government Agencies and Public Services, as it outlines regulations and responsibilities for agencies in collecting information. However, it does not explicitly address how AI is applied or regulated within these contexts, instead focusing on procedural compliance. There is potential for automated systems to be mentioned, but the text does not provide in-depth insight into AI applications, hence the lower relevance scores. The text does not directly touch upon any specific elements related to Politics and Elections, Judicial System, Healthcare, Private Enterprises, Academic Institutions, International Standards, Nonprofits, or Emerging sectors.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (2) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill mandates that vehicle manufacturers provide clear maintenance instructions to new vehicle purchasers, ensuring compliance with emission standards and facilitating emission-related repairs. It emphasizes transparency in maintenance requirements and diagnostic information.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: July 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text predominantly outlines maintenance instructions for motor vehicles and does not directly reference or address artificial intelligence or its societal impacts. The mention of emission standards and on-board diagnostic systems could imply aspects of automated decision-making and data management; however, there are no explicit discussions regarding AI-related concepts like algorithms or machine learning advances. Consequently, its relevance to the social impact, data governance, system integrity, and robustness categories is weak.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text is primarily focused on automotive maintenance, compliance with emission regulations, and manufacturer responsibilities, with no references to the use or regulation of AI in the specified sectors. While vehicle diagnostics may involve algorithmic processes, they are not explicitly identified as AI-driven, reducing relevance to sectors like healthcare, government services, and judicial systems. Thus, the overall relevance to the defined sectors is minimal.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (2) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill outlines methods for modeling CO2 emissions for vocational vehicles and tractors, ensuring compliance with established emission standards using specific modeling tools and engineering guidelines.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: July 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text primarily focuses on modeling CO2 emissions for vocational vehicles and tractors, detailing compliance measures that include calculations and specifications related to vehicle engineering and design efficiencies. It does not contain specific references to AI technologies or their implications in the computation or modeling processes. Therefore, it does not significantly align with the categories related to AI frameworks such as Social Impact, Data Governance, System Integrity, or Robustness. Thus, each category receives a low relevance score.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text deals mainly with environmental regulations for heavy vehicles and does not address broader application sectors like politics, healthcare, or international standards. However, it can be tangentially associated with Government Agencies due to its regulatory aspects, but does not delve into AI or its governance. Consequently, the scores for sectors indicate minimal relevance.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (3) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill establishes the personal liability of third parties, like lenders or sureties, for wage taxes when they directly pay wages or provide funds for wages, ensuring compliance with tax withholding regulations.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: April 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text pertains primarily to tax liabilities associated with employers and third-party payers regarding wages, with no explicit mentions of AI or related technologies. The content focuses on regulations regarding wage payments, employer responsibilities, and the liabilities of third parties, without exploring any dimension relating to AI's impact, governance, integrity, or robustness.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text does not address any sector specifically utilizing or influenced by AI technologies. It primarily deals with tax regulations related to wages and employment, and does not cover the application of AI in sectors like politics, government services, healthcare, or any emerging technologies. Therefore, it scores a 1 across all sectors.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill appropriates funding for the Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development for FY 2024, ensuring effective oversight and management of federal resources to enhance infrastructure and housing safety.
Collection: Congressional Hearings
Status date: March 28, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: House of Representatives
The text primarily discusses appropriations and oversight of the Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development. It does not directly mention any AI-specific terminology or applications, which limits its relevance to AI-related legislation. While topics such as automated decision-making or algorithms may tangentially relate to infrastructure and housing practices in broader contexts, the specific concerns outlined in the hearings do not address AI's societal impacts or the governance of data related to AI systems. As such, the categories of Social Impact, Data Governance, System Integrity, and Robustness are all only slightly relevant, if applicable at all.
Sector:
Government Agencies and Public Services (see reasoning)
The text predominantly pertains to the appropriations process for government agencies, specifically transportation and housing. There are references to oversight and management challenges but no explicit discussions around the use or regulation of AI within each sector mentioned. As such, none of the sectors score high as they do not address specific AI applications in politics, government services, healthcare, or others. Most relevancy is around government agencies and public services, yet it does not substantially or explicitly involve AI, resulting in low to moderate relevance across the board.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill addresses accountability and transparency at the IRS, focusing on improvements in taxpayer services and protecting whistleblowers while ensuring fair enforcement without increasing audits on low-to-middle income earners.
Collection: Congressional Hearings
Status date: April 27, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: House of Representatives
System Integrity (see reasoning)
The provided text primarily discusses accountability and transparency issues related to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rather than featuring AI technology or its applications directly. There are mentions of data security, which could tangentially relate to AI in cases where AI is used for data analysis or management, but the text does not reference any AI-specific technologies or applications. Therefore, its relevance to the categories is minimal. The conversations revolve around budget allocations, service improvements, and management issues within the IRS, with no explicit linkage to AI-driven technologies, algorithms, or any transformative applications of AI in this context. The focus is predominantly on traditional governance and oversight rather than on AI's societal, operational, or regulatory implications.
Sector:
Government Agencies and Public Services (see reasoning)
This text is largely centered on the IRS's operational accountability and transparency regarding implementation and improvements post-legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act. It does address processes of data security, which are important in the context of agency operations, but it does not specifically address any AI-related applications. For the sectors, the most applicable appears to be Government Agencies and Public Services due to its focus on the IRS's operations but does not directly mention AI in relation to these sectors. Consequently, the relevance is limited as it centers more on the functions of the IRS rather than on AI's implications or application across various sectors.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (4) show keywords in context
Description: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should negotiate strong, inclusive, and forward-looking rules on digital trade and the digital economy with like-minded countries as part of its broader trade and economic strategy in order to ensure American values of democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, human and worker rights, privacy, and a free and open internet are at the very core of digital governance.
Summary: The bill urges the U.S. to negotiate inclusive digital trade rules with like-minded nations, promoting American values in governance, ensuring fairness, and enhancing economic growth in the digital economy.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: March 30, 2023
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: Darin LaHood
(5 total sponsors)
Last action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (March 30, 2023)
Societal Impact
Data Governance
System Integrity (see reasoning)
The text primarily discusses the negotiation of rules on digital trade and the digital economy, which does not inherently address AI's societal implications. However, it references the need for rules governing the use of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies, indicating moderate relevance to the topic of AI’s social impact, particularly concerning privacy and human rights. The focus on privacy and data flows relates to Data Governance, showing a need for secure handling of personal information in digital trade agreements, hence there's a significant connection to this category. The text also indirectly relates to System Integrity as it advocates for strong negotiation principles that would enhance security and governance, suggesting a desire for accountability in how AI and digital technologies are integrated into trade. Regarding Robustness, the text lacks explicit focus on benchmarking or auditing AI systems, leading to a lower relevance score in this category.
Sector:
Government Agencies and Public Services
International Cooperation and Standards (see reasoning)
The resolution addresses the intersection of digital trade with various sectors but does not narrow down to specific industry applications of AI. The most pertinent relevance is seen in Government Agencies and Public Services due to the implication that the government will be involved in negotiating standards for digital trade and technology, which could include AI technologies. While the references to privacy and security suggestions align with Governance principles, they are not specific to any sector’s application of AI beyond governmental oversight. The connection to the private sector is suggested through mentions of small and medium enterprises utilizing digital technology but does not expressly focus on AI in private enterprises. Thus Government Agencies and Public Services receives a moderate score. Other sectors such as Politics and Elections and Healthcare do not stand out explicitly in the text, indicating minimal relevance.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (1) show keywords in context
Summary: The bill establishes guidelines for prompt payments to contractors by the Government, allowing timely payments and interest penalties for delays, while also outlining invoice requirements and assignment conditions.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Oct. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
This document primarily relates to procurement and payment processes in government contracts. It does not directly address the societal impacts, data governance, system integrity, or robustness of AI systems, as it lacks mention of specific AI-related technologies or implications. As such, the relevance to any of the categories is exceedingly low.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text discusses procedures related to contracting and payments within government contracts, and while this may touch on government transactions that could potentially involve automated systems or digital processes (like electronic invoicing), it does not specifically address the application or regulation of AI within any sector. This leads to a very low relevance for all specified sectors.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1)
Summary: The bill establishes an Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) Program for surfclams and ocean quahogs, regulating annual quotas, permit requirements, and ownership caps to manage resources sustainably.
Collection: Code of Federal Regulations
Status date: Oct. 1, 2023
Status: Issued
Source: Office of the Federal Register
The text focuses primarily on fishing quotas and management practices under the Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) Program without addressing AI or its implications in any form. There are no references to the specified AI-related terms and concepts, rendering the text largely irrelevant to the categories of Social Impact, Data Governance, System Integrity, and Robustness. As such, a score of 1 in all categories is justified, as there is simply no connection to artificial intelligence-related legislation or considerations.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
The text does not pertain to any of the predefined sectors of legislation regarding politics, governance, the judiciary, healthcare, business, education, international standards, nonprofit activities, or emerging sectors. It is centered entirely on fisheries management under specific regulatory frameworks. Thus, each sector score is 1, indicating no relevance.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (1)