5044 results:
Description: A bill to establish the Task Force on Artificial Intelligence in the Financial Services Sector to report to Congress on issues related to artificial intelligence in the financial services sector, and for other purposes.
Summary: The bill establishes a Task Force on Artificial Intelligence in the Financial Services Sector to report to Congress on AI-related security issues, benefits, and legislative recommendations for consumer protection.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 18, 2025
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: Jon Husted
(2 total sponsors)
Last action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (June 18, 2025)
Societal Impact
Data Governance
System Integrity (see reasoning)
This legislation is highly relevant to Social Impact as it directly addresses issues related to the unique threats that artificial intelligence poses to customer safety and the potential for identity and data theft. The bill acknowledges the societal implications of AI applications in banking and consumer interactions, making it very relevant to discussions on consumer protections and interactions with AI. Data Governance is also relevant due to the emphasis on protecting consumer identities and data from AI abuses, highlighting the need for regulations to ensure security against potential fraud facilitated by AI technologies. System Integrity is pertinent since the bill discusses the risks associated with AI and includes mandates for practices that protect consumers, which suggests a focus on the integrity of AI systems in financial services. Robustness, while relevant on some level due to the mention of standards for definitions of AI-related terms, is not a primary focus of this bill. Therefore, the strongest relevance is found in Social Impact and Data Governance, followed by System Integrity, while Robustness is less applicable.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
This legislation has a direct bearing on the Financial Services sector as it establishes a Task Force specifically focused on the impacts of artificial intelligence within this context. It addresses concerns unique to the sector, such as the use of AI in banking and credit services, which underscores its relevance. Other sectors like Politics and Elections, Healthcare, or Nonprofits do not pertain to the content of this bill. Therefore, the strongest fit is clearly with the Financial Services sector.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (11) machine learning (1) deepfake (1) show keywords in context
Description: Modifies child endangerment statute to include AI technology; establishes criminal penalties.
Summary: The bill amends New Jersey's child endangerment statute to include criminal penalties for using AI technology to expose children to sexual conduct, addressing safety concerns around simulated interactions.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 16, 2025
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: Andrea Katz
(3 total sponsors)
Last action: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness Committee (June 16, 2025)
Description: A bill to establish immunity from civil liability for certain artificial intelligence developers, and for other purposes.
Summary: The RISE Act of 2025 establishes civil liability immunity for AI developers when their products are used by professionals, contingent on transparency and accountability measures, to encourage responsible AI innovation.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 12, 2025
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: Cynthia Lummis
(sole sponsor)
Last action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (June 12, 2025)
Description: Regulates the development and use of certain artificial intelligence systems to prevent algorithmic discrimination; requires independent audits of high risk AI systems; provides for enforcement by the attorney general as well as a private right of action.
Summary: The New York AI Act regulates artificial intelligence systems to prevent algorithmic discrimination, mandates independent audits of high-risk AI, and allows enforcement by the attorney general and private citizens.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 12, 2025
Status: Engrossed
Primary sponsor: Kristen Gonzalez
(16 total sponsors)
Last action: referred to ways and means (June 12, 2025)
Description: Requires synthetic content creations system providers to include provenance data on synthetic content produced or modified by a synthetic content creations system that such provider makes available.
Summary: The "Stop Deepfakes Act" requires providers of synthetic content creation systems to apply provenance data to any synthetic content they produce or modify, enhancing transparency about its origin and modifications.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 12, 2025
Status: Engrossed
Primary sponsor: Andrew Gounardes
(sole sponsor)
Last action: ordered to third reading rules cal.900 (June 17, 2025)
Societal Impact
Data Governance
System Integrity (see reasoning)
The text pertains to the inclusion of provenance data for synthetic content produced by generative artificial intelligence systems. This closely aligns with 'Social Impact' as it addresses the potential for misinformation through deepfakes, necessitating accountability and consumer protection measures. Regarding 'Data Governance', the provenance requirements also highlight the need for accurate data management as it affects content authenticity and accountability. 'System Integrity' is relevant since the legislation mandates transparency measures around the use of AI systems in content generation, emphasizing human oversight in verifying the provenance of synthetic content. However, it does not specifically address the integrity of the systems themselves or security measures against AI misuse. Finally, while 'Robustness' could be relevant if the legislation included benchmarks for AI performance, it primarily focuses on data provenance and usage rather than performance standards or compliance audits. Therefore, 'Social Impact' and 'Data Governance' resonate very strongly with the text, while 'System Integrity' is less so. 'Robustness' appears to be irrelevant.
Sector:
Politics and Elections
Government Agencies and Public Services (see reasoning)
The text particularly highlights how generative artificial intelligence is being regulated in terms of content provenance, which is crucial for sectors like 'Politics and Elections' due to the implications for misinformation. However, it primarily impacts the 'Government Agencies and Public Services' sector as it mandates that state agencies apply provenance data to digital content published or distributed. The focus on misinformation makes it tangentially relevant to 'Judicial System' since the accuracy of evidence can be affected by AI-generated content, but this is not the main focus of the document. The healthcare, private enterprises, academic institutions, and nonprofit sectors don't seem directly focused on, given the context of synthetic media regulation. There is little mention of international cooperation unless licenses or standards are considered across state lines in the future. Thus, 'Government Agencies and Public Services' is the primary relevant sector, with slight relevance to 'Politics and Elections' and 'Judicial System'.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (6) automated (1) show keywords in context
Description: Regulates automated decision-making by government agencies; requires agencies to conduct impact assessments; requires disclosure of automated decision-making tools utilized by governmental agencies.
Summary: The bill regulates automated decision-making by government agencies in New York, requiring impact assessments, tool disclosures, and ensuring meaningful human oversight to address bias and protect individual rights.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 12, 2025
Status: Engrossed
Primary sponsor: Kristen Gonzalez
(10 total sponsors)
Last action: returned to senate (June 16, 2025)
Description: To amend sections 3517.153, 3517.154, 3517.155, 3517.993, and 3599.40 and to enact section 3517.24 of the Revised Code to regulate the dissemination of deceptive and fraudulent synthetic media for the purpose of influencing the results of an election.
Summary: This bill aims to regulate the use and dissemination of deceptive synthetic media designed to influence election outcomes in Ohio, ensuring transparency and accountability in election-related communications.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 12, 2025
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: Joseph Miller
(10 total sponsors)
Last action: Introduced (June 12, 2025)
Societal Impact
Data Governance
System Integrity (see reasoning)
The legislation clearly addresses the implications of synthetic media, with a specific focus on its potential to mislead individuals during elections, which aligns with the Social Impact category. The text discusses consumer protections regarding deceptive media and accountability measures for those who disseminate such media, indicating that it is relevant to societal harm and misinformation caused by AI-generated content. The Data Governance category is also relevant since it addresses requirements for transparency in synthetic media, focusing on maintaining the integrity of data presented to the public by mandating disclosures about AI manipulation. System Integrity is somewhat relevant as it emphasizes the need for oversight in the release of AI-generated synthetic media, but it is less focused on security and technical standards. Robustness is not particularly relevant as the legislation does not discuss performance benchmarking of AI systems but focuses on regulation of deceptive practices. Overall, the strongest relevance is found in the Social Impact and Data Governance categories, followed by System Integrity.
Sector:
Politics and Elections
Government Agencies and Public Services (see reasoning)
This legislation directly pertains to the sector of Politics and Elections, as it regulates the use of AI in the context of electoral processes by addressing the dissemination of deceptive synthetic media in political campaigns. The implications of synthetic media for misleading voters are crucial to ensuring fair electoral practices. The relevance to Government Agencies and Public Services is moderate, as the enforcement and oversight mechanisms involve state bodies like the Ohio elections commission, but these mechanisms are fundamentally tied to electoral integrity and not general public services. The legislation does not specifically address the Judicial System, Healthcare, Private Enterprises, Labor, and Employment, Academic and Research Institutions, International Cooperation and Standards, Nonprofits and NGOs, or Hybrid, Emerging, and Unclassified sectors. Thus, the most significant relevance is in the Politics and Elections sector.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (2) synthetic media (12) show keywords in context
Description: Bans the use of AI on state assets if the AI is developed or owned by a covered vendor. (Flesch Readability Score: 80.6). [Digest: Bans the use of AI on state assets if the AI is owned or developed by a foreign corporate entity. (Flesch Readability Score: 68.0).] Prohibits any hardware, software or service that uses artificial intelligence from being installed or downloaded onto or used or accessed by state information technology assets if the artificial intelligence is developed or owned by ...
Summary: House Bill 3936 enhances the security of state assets by regulating the use of products from designated "covered vendors," particularly those involving artificial intelligence, to mitigate national security threats.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 12, 2025
Status: Enrolled
Primary sponsor: Darcey Edwards
(2 total sponsors)
Last action: Third reading. Carried by Robinson. Passed. Ayes, 27; Excused, 3--Nash, Smith DB, Starr. (June 12, 2025)
Description: Provides for the continuous revision of the Code of Civil Procedure
Summary: This bill updates Louisiana's Code of Civil Procedure, amending multiple articles to improve procedural clarity, address judicial processes, and enhance attorney conduct, with an emphasis on efficiency in civil cases.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 11, 2025
Status: Passed
Primary sponsor: Mike Johnson
(sole sponsor)
Last action: Effective date: 08/01/2025. (June 11, 2025)
Description: To direct the Director of the National Security Agency to develop strategies to secure artificial intelligence related technologies.
Summary: The Advanced AI Security Readiness Act mandates the NSA to create an AI Security Playbook, aimed at securing advanced AI technologies from theft by threat actors through comprehensive strategies and guidelines.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 11, 2025
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: Darin LaHood
(4 total sponsors)
Last action: Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select). (June 11, 2025)
Description: To amend sections 3.15, 9.03, 9.07, 9.239, 9.24, 9.27, 9.28, 9.312, 9.331, 9.334, 9.35, 9.67, 9.681, 9.821, 101.30, 101.352, 101.53, 101.63, 101.65, 101.82, 101.83, 101.84, 102.02, 103.05, 103.051, 103.13, 103.65, 106.02, 106.021, 106.023, 106.024, 106.031, 107.03, 107.032, 107.033, 107.12, 109.02, 109.71, 109.73, 109.77, 109.803, 111.15, 111.27, 113.05, 113.13, 113.40, 113.51, 113.53, 113.78, 117.11, 117.38, 117.44, 117.56, 119.03, 119.04, 120.06, 120.08, 121.02, 121.03, 121.085, 121.22, 121...
Summary: The bill appropriates state operating funds for the fiscal year 2026-27 and amends various sections of Ohio law, ensuring budget allocations are aligned with state needs.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 11, 2025
Status: Enrolled
Primary sponsor: Brian Stewart
(8 total sponsors)
Last action: Sent To The Governor (June 27, 2025)
The text does not contain any explicit mentions of AI technologies or related keyword terms. It largely encompasses a series of legislative amendments and appropriations relating to state operations. As such, it lacks relevance to any discussions surrounding AI impacts on society, data governance practices, system integrity, or robustness of AI technologies.
Sector: None (see reasoning)
Similarly, the text does not indicate any sector-specific applications or legislation addressing the use of AI in areas such as politics, public services, healthcare, or any of the other defined sectors. As it primarily focuses on appropriations and administrative amendments, it does not provide insights or directives that pertain to AI use in public, legal, or private sector contexts.
Keywords (occurrence): artificial intelligence (12) automated (46) show keywords in context
Description: Memorializes the United States Congress to take action relative to the use of artificial intelligence in health care
Summary: The bill urges Congress to regulate artificial intelligence in healthcare, advocating for physician control over medical decisions and ensuring patient safety, data privacy, and ethical standards.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 10, 2025
Status: Passed
Primary sponsor: Jeremy LaCombe
(3 total sponsors)
Last action: Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House. (June 11, 2025)
Description: Creates a task force to study and recommend policies to promote Small Nuclear Reactors in Louisiana
Summary: The bill establishes a task force in Louisiana to study and suggest policies for promoting small modular nuclear reactors, addressing energy infrastructure and support for data center development.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 10, 2025
Status: Passed
Primary sponsor: Michael Echols
(2 total sponsors)
Last action: Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House. (June 11, 2025)
Societal Impact
Data Governance (see reasoning)
The text significantly discusses the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and their impact on the energy sector, particularly in relation to data centers that support AI functionalities. The discussions surrounding AI's role in enhancing productivity, economic growth projections due to AI development, and the energy demands of AI applications highlight the relevance of AI to social and economic contexts. However, while it mentions data centers and AI, it does not delve deeply into impacts on social structures, regulatory frameworks for data privacy, the transparency of the systems, or benchmarks for AI, leading to varied but moderate relevance scores. Thus, it does not present extreme applicability to robustness or system integrity as it mainly focuses on the energy aspect of AI.
Sector:
Government Agencies and Public Services
Private Enterprises, Labor, and Employment (see reasoning)
The text involves a task force that connects to the technology sector particularly through its focus on small modular nuclear reactors which support data centers, essential for AI functionalities. The mention of AI in relation to energy consumption and productivity aligns well with the private enterprises sector as it relates to corporate governance. There are elements relevant to government agencies due to the legislative and regulatory aspect of forming a task force, and this could have implications on public service delivery since energy is a core component. However, the lack of specific mentions of AI in educational institutions, judiciary, or nonprofits leads to more moderate relevance across the sectors.
Keywords (occurrence): machine learning (1) show keywords in context
Description: An Act to Ensure Transparency in Consumer Transactions Involving Artificial Intelligence
Summary: The bill requires clear disclosure when artificial intelligence chatbots are used in consumer transactions, ensuring consumers are not misled into thinking they are interacting with humans, aligning with transparency in trade practices.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 10, 2025
Status: Passed
Primary sponsor: Amy Kuhn
(6 total sponsors)
Last action: PASSED TO BE ENACTED, in concurrence. (June 10, 2025)
Description: CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- IDENTITY THEFT PROTECTION ACT OF 2015 - Amends the Identity Theft Protection Act by eliminating current definitions and establishing new definitions. This act also raises the penalty provisions for violations.
Summary: The bill amends the Identity Theft Protection Act, updating definitions and increasing penalties for violations to enhance protection of personally identifiable information in Rhode Island.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 10, 2025
Status: Engrossed
Primary sponsor: Victoria Gu
(10 total sponsors)
Last action: Senate passed Sub A as amended (floor amendment) (June 10, 2025)
Description: To implement the recommendations of the Department of Transportation concerning the Connecticut Plan Coordinate System, an autonomous vehicle pilot program, crosswalks, light rail transit signals, highway service signs, federal surface transportation urban program funding, rail facilities and transit districts.
Summary: The bill implements various transportation recommendations, focusing on regulations for transportation network companies, traffic enforcement, laser projection at aircraft, and improving small harbor projects, enhancing overall transportation safety and infrastructure in Connecticut.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 10, 2025
Status: Passed
Primary sponsor: Transportation Committee
(4 total sponsors)
Last action: Public Act 25-65 (June 10, 2025)
Societal Impact (see reasoning)
The text addresses automated traffic enforcement safety devices and includes an autonomous vehicle pilot program, which are directly related to AI technologies in traffic management. The mention of 'automated' suggests a use of AI for traffic control and enforcement, relevant to the Social Impact category due to implications for public safety and the influence on transportation systems. The need for safety, accountability, and the potential effects of these technologies on society resonate with topics such as fairness, public trust, and automated decision-making. However, specific references to data governance, system integrity, or robustness are minimal. Therefore, it connects primarily with the social impacts of AI, making it very relevant to that category while moderately relevant to others based on the implications of automated systems.
Sector:
Government Agencies and Public Services (see reasoning)
This text primarily engages with Government Agencies and Public Services through its focus on the Department of Transportation and state legislation concerning transportation networks and safety. The regulation of traffic signals and other controlled environments connects to governmental oversight and operational improvements. It does not closely relate to the other sectors since there are no explicit mentions of political campaigns, healthcare provisions, or specific provisions for judicial systems, private enterprises, or NGOs. Therefore, Government Agencies and Public Services holds the most relevance among the sectors named.
Keywords (occurrence): automated (2) show keywords in context
Description: Regulates the development and use of certain artificial intelligence systems to prevent algorithmic discrimination; requires independent audits of high risk AI systems; provides for enforcement by the attorney general as well as a private right of action.
Summary: The New York AI Act regulates artificial intelligence systems to prevent algorithmic discrimination, mandates independent audits for high-risk AI, and establishes enforcement measures, including a private right of action.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 9, 2025
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: Michaelle Solages
(17 total sponsors)
Last action: reference changed to ways and means (June 11, 2025)
Description: Adopt the Ensuring Transparency in Prior Authorization Act and provide for insurance and medicaid coverage of biomarker testing
Summary: The Ensuring Transparency in Prior Authorization Act mandates clearer processes for prior authorization in healthcare, requires insurance and Medicaid coverage for biomarker testing, and aims to enhance transparency and efficiency in patient care decisions.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 5, 2025
Status: Passed
Primary sponsor: Eliot Bostar
(sole sponsor)
Last action: Approved by Governor on June 4, 2025 (June 5, 2025)
Description: To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Director of the National Science Foundation to carry out cross-cutting and collaborative research and development activities focused on the joint advancement of Department of Agriculture and National Science Foundation mission requirements and priorities, and for other purposes.
Summary: The NSF and USDA Interagency Research Act aims to promote collaborative research and development between the Department of Agriculture and the National Science Foundation to enhance mission objectives and foster innovation in agriculture and technology.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 4, 2025
Status: Introduced
Primary sponsor: James Baird
(2 total sponsors)
Last action: Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (June 4, 2025)
Description: An act to add Title 23 (commencing with Section 3273.72) to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, relating to social media platforms.
Summary: Senate Bill 771 establishes civil penalties for social media platforms violating California's civil rights laws, particularly regarding hate crimes and discrimination, thus enhancing accountability and protections in the digital space.
Collection: Legislation
Status date: June 4, 2025
Status: Engrossed
Primary sponsor: Henry Stern
(9 total sponsors)
Last action: Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (July 10, 2025)